Squeezed Light Evades Back-Action in 40-Kilogram Oscillator

Frequency-dependent squeezing creates a negative imprecision–back-action correlation, cutting observed motion near a feedback-defined resonance by about 47%.

Editorial Desk·September 20, 2026·4 min readstrong

Underlying Paper

Observing and evading quantum back-action on a kilogram-scale oscillator

Beg\"um Kabag\"oz (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Eric Oelker (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Dhruva Ganapathy (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Nergis Mavalvala (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Vivishek Sudhir (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Vladimir Bossilkov (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Joseph Betzweiser (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Valery V. Frolov (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Anamaria Effler (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Adam Mullavey (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Lisa Barsotti (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Evan D. Hall (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Peter Fritschel (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Abbott (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)I. Abouelfettouh (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. X. Adhikari (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Ananyeva (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. Appert (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. K. Apple (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. Arai (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)N. Aritomi (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. M. Aston (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Ball (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. W. Ballmer (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. Barker (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)B. K. Berger (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. Bhattacharjee (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)G. Billingsley (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. Biscans (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. D. Blair (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)N. Bode (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)E. Bonilla (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Branch (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. F. Brooks (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. D. Brown (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Bryant (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. Cahillane (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Calafat (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. R. Callos (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)H. Cao (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)E. Capote (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)F. Clara (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Collins (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. M. Compton (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)G. Connolly (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Cottingham (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. C. Coyne (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Crouch (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Csizmazia (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Cumming (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)L. P. Dartez (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. Davis (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)N. Demos (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)E. Dohmen (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. L. Dooley (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. C. Driggers (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. E. Dwyer (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Ejlli (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)T. Etzel (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Evans (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Feicht (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Frey (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)W. Frischhertz (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Fuentes-Garcia (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)P. Fulda (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Fyffe (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)B. Gateley (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)T. Gayer (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. A. Giaime (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. D. Giardina (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Glanzer (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)E. Goetz (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Goetz (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. W. Goodwin-Jones (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. Gras (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. Gray (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. Griffith (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)H. Grote (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)T. Guidry (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Gurs (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Hanks (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Hanson (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. C. Heintze (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. F. Helmling-Cornell (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)N. A. Holland (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. Hoyland (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)H. Y. Huang (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)Y. Inoue (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. L. James (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Jamies (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Jaume (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Jennings (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)W. Jia (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. H. Jones (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. Karat (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. Karki (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Kasprzack (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. Kawabe (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)N. Kijbunchoo (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)P. J. King (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. S. Kissel (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. Komori (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Kontos (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Kumar (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. Kuns (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Landry (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)B. Lantz (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Laxen (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. Lee (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Lesovsky (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)F. Llamas Villarreal (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Lormand (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)H. A. Loughlin (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Macas (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. MacInnis (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. N. Makarem (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)B. Mannix (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)G. L. Mansell (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. M. Martin (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. Mason (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)F. Matichard (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)N. Maxwell (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)G. McCarrol (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. McCarthy (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. E. McClelland (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. McCormick (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)T. McRae (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)F. Mera (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)E. L. Merilh (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. R. M\'erou (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)F. Meylahn (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Mittleman (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. Moraru (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)G. Moreno (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Nakano (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)T. J. N. Nelson (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Neunzert (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Notte (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Oberling (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)T. O'Hanlon (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Oram (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. Osthelder (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. J. Ottaway (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)H. Overmier (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)W. Parker (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)O. Patane (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Pele (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)H. Pham (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Pirello (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Pullin (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)V. Quetschke (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. E. Ramirez (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. Ransom (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Reyes (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. W. Richardson (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Robinson (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. G. Rollins (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. L. Romel (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. H. Romie (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. P. Ross (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)B. I. Rotimi (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. Ryan (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)T. Sadecki (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Sanchez (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)E. J. Sanchez (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)L. E. Sanchez (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. L. Savage (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. Schaetzl (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. G. Schiworski (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Schnabel (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. M. S. Schofield (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)E. Schwartz (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. Sellers (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)T. Shaffer (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. W. Short (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. Sigg (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)B. J. J. Slagmolen (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. Soike (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)S. Soni (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)V. Srivastava (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)L. Sun (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)D. B. Tanner (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. Thomas (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)P. Thomas (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)K. A. Thorne (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. R. Todd (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. I. Torrie (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)G. Traylor (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. S. Ubhi (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)G. Vajente (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Vanosky (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. Vecchio (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)P. J. Veitch (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)A. M. Vibhute (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)E. R. G. von Reis (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. Warner (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)B. Weaver (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)R. Weiss (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. Whittle (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)B. Willke (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)C. C. Wipf (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)J. L. Wright (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)V. A. Xu (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)H. Yamamoto (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)L. Zhang (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)M. E. Zucker (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Detector Authors)

Continuous quantum displacement measurements are fundamentally limited by a trade-off between readout imprecision and measurement back-action, constrained by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. In the Laser Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), these two quantum noise components dominate much of the observation band, making it an excellent testbed. We induce a sub-Hz-linewidth optomechanical mode by trapping the differential motion of the 40-kg mirrors in a band where radiation-pressure back-action dominates the motion. Engineering the quantum state entering the dark port creates correlations between imprecision and back-action that partially cancel their contributions, reducing observed motion near resonance by ~47%. A framework resolving the imprecision, back-action, and correlation terms identifies the origin of this suppression. These results demonstrate quantum back-action evasion and quantum reservoir engineering in a macroscopic optomechanical system.

arXiv:2609.19317Submitted: Sep 18, 2026v1

Continuous position measurements face a quantum trade-off: reducing readout imprecision generally increases radiation-pressure force noise, and vice versa. In gravitational-wave interferometers, both terms shape sensitivity across much of the observing band. This study uses LIGO’s differential arm motion as a macroscopic test mass, then engineers the quantum state entering the dark port so that the two noise channels become correlated rather than merely competing.

The experiment is unusual because the measured object is not a microfabricated resonator. Feedback turns the differential motion of LIGO’s 40-kg mirrors into a narrow, sub-Hz-linewidth optomechanical mode, placing its resonance in a region where radiation-pressure back-action substantially contributes to motion. The authors report that frequency-dependent squeezing reduces observed displacement near that resonance by about 47% through correlation-driven cancellation.

Core Contribution

The central contribution is an experimental separation of three terms that are often combined in a measured noise spectrum: effective imprecision, effective back-action, and their cross-correlation. Frequency-independent squeezing improves high-frequency imprecision, but it does not supply the frequency-shaped correlation needed to counter radiation pressure at the trapped-mode resonance. Frequency-dependent squeezing does.

That distinction matters for interferometric sensing. Squeezing is already used to lower quantum noise in gravitational-wave detectors, but a broadband reduction in one quadrature does not automatically evade back-action. The paper’s claim is narrower and more useful: by rotating the injected squeezed state with frequency, the measurement can produce a negative correlation term precisely where back-action is most consequential.

Technical Approach

The apparatus combines the arm cavities, signal-recycling cavity, antisymmetric-port readout, and digital feedback acting on the test-mass suspensions. The control loop modifies the nominal differential-arm susceptibility χ0\chi_0 into an effective susceptibility χeff\chi_{\mathrm{eff}}, creating a trap resonance at 151 Hz while leaving the broadband loop behavior comparatively unchanged away from that narrow feature.

Figure 1 lays out both the optical chain and its equivalent feedback model. Thermal, technical, and radiation-pressure forces drive the mechanical response; interferometric sensing adds measurement imprecision; and the calibrated error signal is digitally filtered and returned as a feedback force. This representation makes clear that the reported cancellation is assessed at the observed-displacement level, after the sensing and feedback dynamics are included.

Figure 1. Instrument overview and feedback-loop representation.

The authors compare three input states: unmodified vacuum, frequency-independent squeezing, and frequency-dependent squeezing. Their quantum-noise model decomposes the frequency-dependent case into SxximpS_{xx}^{\mathrm{imp}}, SxxbaS_{xx}^{\mathrm{ba}}, and Sxximp,baS_{xx}^{\mathrm{imp,ba}}. Cancellation requires the last term to be negative, so that it offsets part of the positive back-action contribution rather than simply redistributing noise between frequencies.

Results and Analysis

The measured spectra cover the trapped-mode region as well as the 40–145 Hz band used to examine the noise model against coating thermal noise. Figure 2 shows that the frequency-dependent configuration falls below both vacuum and frequency-independent squeezing near the resonance. The reported approximately 47% reduction is therefore not just a high-frequency shot-noise improvement: it is localized to the regime where the feedback-defined oscillator has its strongest response.

Figure 2. Observed displacement spectra and quantum-noise model for the trapped mode.

Figure 3 provides the more diagnostic evidence. Frequency-independent and frequency-dependent squeezing offer similar imprecision reduction at higher frequencies, whereas only the frequency-dependent configuration develops a negative imprecision–back-action correlation over the trapped-mode band. Its cross term cancels part of the inferred back-action term, and the back-action-evasion metric rises over the same range. That alignment between the decomposition, sign of the correlation, and observed resonance suppression supports the mechanism claimed in the paper.

Figure 3. Quantum-noise decomposition and correlation-driven back-action evasion.

The result is experimentally persuasive because it compares three quantum-state configurations in the same interferometer and tests a model against spectra, not just a single integrated noise number. But its practical scope is narrow. The reported effect is centered on a feedback-created 151 Hz mode rather than demonstrated as a broadband sensitivity improvement for astrophysical searches. It nevertheless establishes a route for using frequency-dependent quantum correlations as an active measurement resource in kilogram-scale optomechanics and future interferometric detectors.

Evidence Box

strong

Key Claims

  • Frequency-dependent squeezing creates correlations that evade radiation-pressure back-action
  • A feedback-trapped LIGO differential mode enables macroscopic quantum-noise measurements
  • Quantum reservoir engineering can suppress observed motion of a kilogram-scale oscillator

Key Results

  • About 47% lower observed motion near resonance with frequency-dependent squeezing
  • 40-kg LIGO mirrors used as the measured differential-arm oscillator
  • 151 Hz feedback-defined trap resonance used to probe correlation-driven suppression
  • Noise-model comparison examined the 40–145 Hz band alongside coating thermal noise

Limitations & Caveats

  • Suppression demonstrated around a narrow feedback-defined 151 Hz resonance
  • No broadband astrophysical-search sensitivity improvement reported
  • Observed-displacement result depends on calibrated sensing, actuation, and feedback-loop modeling

Related Articles

Readers are encouraged to consult the original arXiv paper for complete details. SOTA Papers does not make claims beyond what is supported by the authors' reported evidence.